The big buzz in hard drives right now is Western Digital's 3TB WD Caviar Green (Model WD30EZRS) internal drive. Along with its cavernous capacity, the drive boasts a 64MB cache and is SATA 3Gbit/sec.-compatible. But what makes it special, it's the largest capacity internal hard drive currently available, is also what makes it awkward.
To begin with, operating systems such as Microsoft Windows, including Windows 7, tend to use a Master Boot Record (MBR) partition table arrangement as their standard. MBR can only address 232 logical blocks on the hard drive with a common sector size of 512 bytes, in other words, a maximum of 2.19TB of data.
The alternative is to use GUID Partition Tables (GPT), which allow for up to 264 of logical block addressing. The file system is still Windows NTFS, but the partitioning scheme allows for drives larger than 2.19TB.
Unfortunately, I ran into problems when I tried to switch to GPT on a Windows Vista system. Vista offered the choice of partitioning as MBR or GPT the first time through but then reverted to MBR-only. After a few unsuccessful hours of trying to fix the situation, I simply wiped the system's boot drive and installed Windows 7. Everything worked well after that.
While 32-bit Windows XP systems can't handle GPT natively, there is a solution: Paragon Software Group's Paragon GPT Loader, which is currently free under its early adopter programme. The software allows XP computers to use drives larger than 2.19TB.
However, there still may be an issue you have to deal with: Not all applications can handle GPT, even on 64-bit systems. As a result, Western Digital has supplied a workaround: a HighPoint Rocket 620 internal half-height SATA card, which it ships with the 3TB drive. The card has two SATA 6 ports and handles the emulation, if needed, to allow software to work with the larger 3TB hard drive.
Testing

In order to test whether using a drive under GPT offered disadvantages (or advantages) over a drive under MBR, in other words to determine if switching the partition scheme for 3TB of space is worth the trouble, I not only tested the performance of the 3TB drive, but also tested a 2TB Caviar Green drive (Model WD20EADS), using both the MBR and GPT partition arrangements.
I first partitioned both drives as GPT and tested using Simpli Software's HD Tach and Futuremark's PCMark Vantage HDD test.
The two drives ran at nearly identical burst speeds, with the 3TB drive marginally faster at average reads (114.9 versus 86.7) and random access (15.6 versus 20.2). The PCMark Vantage results were also virtually the same. The 3TB drive running under a GPT partition table was the performance equal (actually, the slight leader) when compared to the 2TB drive.
Knowing now that the two drives were equivalent performers (in other words, managing the larger capacity 3TB drive caused no lag in performance), I revisited the 2TB and converted its partition table to MBR. Would it be faster or slower than GPT under MBR?
I ran the same test suites, using the same Rocket 620 controller, and compared them to the GPT results for that same drive.
Whether MBR or GPT partitioning was used, the 2TB drive performed identically. In other words, using the 3TB drive under GPT will give you more capacity without slowing performance.

__________________